Last Updated: April 2026
Scale Blog is committed to publishing accurate, independent, and useful content about weighing equipment for US businesses and professionals. This Editorial Policy explains how we research, write, review, and update every article on this site — and how we handle the relationship between editorial content and commercial relationships.
We publish this policy because readers, regulatory professionals, and search engines deserve to know the standards behind the content they rely on. If you have a question about our editorial practices that is not answered here, please contact us through our Contact page.
Our Editorial Mission
Scale Blog exists to provide accurate, application-specific guidance on weighing equipment selection, regulatory compliance, and industry best practices for US operations. Our editorial mission is to produce content that helps readers make better decisions — not content that drives affiliate revenue at the expense of accuracy or usefulness.
Every article we publish is evaluated against one primary question: Does this give the reader the information they actually need to make a correct decision?
Source Standards
Primary Sources
We prioritize primary regulatory sources above all others. For the weighing industry in the United States, primary sources include:
- NIST Handbook 44 — Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices (published annually by the National Institute of Standards and Technology)
- NIST Handbook 133 — Checking the Net Contents of Packaged Goods
- OSHA standards — 29 CFR 1910 (General Industry) and 29 CFR 1926 (Construction) for crane and lifting operations
- USDA Agricultural Marketing Service regulations under the Packers and Stockyards Act
- FDA regulations (21 CFR) for pharmaceutical and food manufacturing applications
- IEC 60529 — Ingress Protection rating standard published by the International Electrotechnical Commission
When a regulatory standard governs a claim we are making, we cite the primary regulatory document directly — not a secondary commentary about it.
Industry and Manufacturer Sources
We use manufacturer documentation, technical guides from established scale dealers, and industry trade publications to support application-specific claims, capacity specifications, and product comparisons. We apply the following hierarchy when selecting industry sources:
- Major scale manufacturers with documented engineering expertise (Mettler Toledo, Rice Lake Weighing Systems, Adam Equipment, Pennsylvania Scale Company, Ohaus, and equivalents)
- ISO/IEC 17025 accredited calibration laboratories and scale service companies
- Established US-scale dealers with demonstrated technical depth
- Industry trade publications (Manufacturing.net, Inbound Logistics, and equivalents)
- Commercial scale retailers — used sparingly and only where no higher-authority source covers the same claim
Sources We Do Not Use
We maintain an internal list of sources we exclude from citation regardless of topic relevance. This list includes companies whose content lacks technical depth, whose primary purpose is lead generation rather than education, or whose business practices are inconsistent with our editorial standards. Sources are excluded on the basis of domain authority, technical accuracy, and editorial independence — not on the basis of whether they offer affiliate programs or commercial relationships.
Fact-Checking and Verification Standards
Every factual claim in every article we publish is checked against at least one verifiable source before publication. We apply the following specific verification standards:
Regulatory claims — Any claim that a particular standard requires or prohibits a specific practice is verified directly against the current edition of the relevant regulatory document. We do not rely on secondary commentary alone for regulatory claims.
Capacity and specification figures — Numerical specifications (capacity ranges, accuracy percentages, IP rating test conditions, calibration intervals) are verified against manufacturer documentation or primary standards before use.
Outbound links — Every outbound link is verified as live before an article is published. Broken links are not embedded in published content.
Regulatory editions — NIST Handbook 44 and NIST Handbook 133 are updated annually. We note the edition in force at the time of writing and review affected articles when new editions are published.
How Articles Are Written
Research Phase
Every article begins with a research phase that includes:
- Identifying the primary regulatory standards relevant to the topic
- Reviewing current manufacturer documentation and industry guidance
- Identifying the most authoritative available sources for each major claim
- Verifying that all outbound links embedded are live
Writing Standards
Articles are written to the following standards:
- US English throughout — all content is written for a US audience
- Imperial measurements first — capacity figures, dimensions, and weights are given in US customary units (lb, ft, in) with metric equivalents where relevant
- USD pricing — all price references are in US dollars
- Active voice preferred — passive construction is minimized
- No unsupported superlatives — claims such as “the best,” “the most accurate,” or “the most popular” are not used without a cited basis
Internal Linking
Articles are interlinked within topical clusters to help readers navigate related content. Internal links reflect genuine topical relevance — they are not placed to manufacture page views or inflate engagement metrics.
Updating and Correcting Content
Scheduled Reviews
Articles that reference annual regulatory publications — particularly NIST Handbook 44 and NIST Handbook 133 — are reviewed annually following the publication of each new edition. Where the regulatory requirements have changed materially, the article is updated, and the “Last Updated” date is revised.
Reader-Submitted Corrections
If a reader identifies a factual error, an outdated regulatory reference, or a broken link in any article, we investigate the correction within five business days of receiving it through our Contact page. If the correction is valid, we update the article and acknowledge the correction. We do not silently delete corrected content — the original claim and the correction are documented in the article’s revision note where the correction is material.
Substantive Updates
When an article is substantially updated — not just corrected — we add an “Updated” note and a new date to the article header. Minor corrections to spelling, grammar, or formatting do not trigger an update notice.
Editorial Independence and Commercial Relationships
Affiliate Links
Some articles on Scale Blog contain affiliate links. The presence of an affiliate link to a product or retailer does not mean that the product was selected for recommendation because of the affiliate relationship. Our editorial process identifies the correct product specification for a given application first, and affiliate links are added afterward where they are available.
Our full affiliate disclosure is available on our Affiliate Disclosure page.
Sponsored Content
Scale Blog does not currently publish sponsored content — articles written on behalf of, or paid for by, a brand or advertiser. If we introduce sponsored content in the future, every sponsored article will be clearly labeled “Sponsored” at the top of the page and will be clearly distinguished from our editorial content.
Advertiser and Affiliate Influence
Advertisers and affiliate partners do not have any influence over the editorial content of Scale Blog. They do not review articles before publication, they do not approve or reject topics, and they do not have any input into the recommendations or conclusions we reach. Commercial relationships affect which links we include — they do not affect what we write.
Contact
If you have a question about our editorial standards, a correction to suggest, or a concern about a specific article, please contact us through our Contact page.